Environmental Protection • Consumer & Competition

Greenwashing Under the EU Microscope – The End of Unfounded "Eco-Marketing" Is Near

Just a few years ago, slogans like "eco," "green," or "climate-neutral" were treated primarily as catchy storytelling elements. Today, they are subject to rigorous scrutiny, and the European Union is sending a clear signal: the era of environmental claims without hard evidence is over.

At the center of these upcoming changes is the fight against greenwashing – communication that suggests a positive (or neutral) environmental impact of a product or an entire company without adequate justification or in a manner that can easily mislead consumers.

What Exactly Is Greenwashing?

Greenwashing is not just about blatantly false claims. In day-to-day market practices, the most problematic issues tend to be:

The core problem is that the average consumer often has no technical capacity to independently verify such claims at the point of sale.

Regulators Are Already Cracking Down on Greenwashing

Although legislative work on new directives is still ongoing in the EU, consumer protection authorities are already using existing laws to challenge pseudo-ecological marketing. In Poland, the primary legal grounds for these actions are the Act on Counteracting Unfair Market Practices and regulations protecting collective consumer interests.

The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (UOKiK) is closely scrutinizing general environmental claims, climate neutrality declarations, and any advertising that might give consumers a false impression of a product's or service's absolute sustainability.

UOKiK in Action – Charges Brought Against Major Brands

Greenwashing has ceased to be an academic or theoretical issue. In recent months, the regulator has significantly tightened its approach.

In July 2025, the President of UOKiK brought official charges against Allegro, DHL, DPD, and InPost over suspected pseudo-ecological marketing. The Office questioned claims regarding "green fleets," "environmental neutrality," and CO₂ emission calculators based on incomplete data.

Source – UOKiK: "Eco-bleeding. The President of UOKiK brings charges against Allegro, DHL, DPD, and InPost"

A few months later, similar greenwashing charges were brought against Bolt, Tchibo, and Zara. In these cases, UOKiK analyzed the use of vague campaign slogans such as "sustainable," "responsible," or "better for people and the planet" without sufficient, clear explanation of what they specifically mean for the given product and what data backs up the claimed benefits.

Source – UOKiK: "The Green Game. Bolt, Tchibo, and Zara charged by the President of UOKiK"

This sends an incredibly clear signal to the entire market: for regulators, the issue is no longer just blatant lies, but overgeneralized "eco-slogans," a lack of transparency, and the creation of misleading impressions.

New EU Directives on the Horizon

The European Union is consistently building a watertight regulatory framework. The most significant upcoming shifts stem directly from:

The new legal approach can be summed up in one sentence: if you communicate an environmental benefit as a business, you must be absolutely able to prove it.

The End of General Eco-Slogans?

Slogans like "eco," "green," "environmentally friendly," or "sustainable" will require highly detailed technical documentation and certification in the future. Claims based solely on carbon offsetting – such as "climate-neutral" or "zero-emission product" – will become particularly problematic. The EU clearly states that planting trees cannot replace actual greenhouse gas reductions in the production process.

What Exactly Will the Green Claims Directive Change?

The draft directive introduces:

Why This Matters for Smaller Companies Too

Many businesses mistakenly assume that greenwashing is a problem reserved for multinational corporations. The new regulations will hit e-commerce stores, cosmetics brands, dietary supplement manufacturers, the fashion sector, and packaging producers with equal force.

The risk is not limited to reputational damage. For practices deemed to violate collective consumer interests, businesses could face massive financial penalties – up to 10% of the company's annual turnover.

"Natural," "Clean Formula," "Less Plastic" – Could These Be a Problem Too?

Yes – and this is where the biggest daily challenge for marketing departments begins. Claims like "100% natural," "clean formula," "plastic-free," or "more eco-friendly packaging" will require explicit clarification: what exactly do they mean, what baseline are they compared against, and whether the average consumer might feel misled by them.

What Should Companies Do Right Now?

The direction of these regulatory shifts is irreversible. Companies should immediately audit their current communication, verify the accuracy and precision of their environmental claims, compile complete supporting evidence, and foster close cooperation between marketing and legal/compliance departments, moving away from trendy, empty slogans.

Summary

The era of eco-marketing based entirely on clever storytelling without substance is coming to an end. New EU regulations and uncompromising enforcement by consumer protection authorities demonstrate that the old market model is history.

The previous model:
"You can say anything until someone asks"
is being replaced by the model: "If you communicate an environmental benefit, you must be ready to prove it."

For businesses, this translates to significantly greater regulatory responsibility, but it also presents a unique opportunity to build real, long-term credibility and competitive advantage based on total transparency.

Want to Check If Your Brand's Communication Is Secure?

I help companies analyze their marketing communication for greenwashing, identify legal risks, and align their messaging with current regulatory expectations and upcoming changes in EU law.

Get in Touch